in Go

How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise? (Read only)

Last post 23/04/2008, 3:59 PM by Community Champion. 9 replies.

To participate in this forum you must Sign in

Sort posts: Previous Next
  • How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise? (Read only)

    This discussion forum will examine issues around work and enterprise.

    The challenge for Britain will be to continue to prosper in an increasingly competitive, global economy whilst moving to a low carbon economy and ensuring everyone has a fair chance of success. The UK economy is fundamentally strong but increasing global competition will require a more highly skilled and creative workforce with a focus on high value added sectors and a strong culture of enterprise. 

    Specifically, we would like to know:

    • How can government at all levels work together to tackle worklessness and promote enterprise in the most deprived areas?

    Our neighbourhood renewal initiatives have put communities in the driving seat to ensure that improvements made are those that matter most to them. But although employment is at historically high levels, there are still too many pockets of deprivation where worklessness is high. We need to galvanise individuals, local communities and businesses, and local authority partners to unlock people’s potential, through promoting work and enterprise. We know there is no single model for the best way to get people back into employment - but we are keen to learn from the

    So, our question to you is;

    • What are the best means of co-ordinating social, economic and physical regeneration?
  • 340 in reply to 325
    20/03/2008, 3:55 PM :: Posted by James Paton (Posts 2)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    How can government at all levels work together to tackle worklessness and promote enterprise in the most deprived areas?

    Ensure central government deaprtments work much better together and that they inform and intstruct their delivery partners in localities i.e. other NDPSBs and local authorities to work much more closely together and better together. This must be about actually invoking through both inducement and sanction the duties to cooperate, involve and engage, and not just talking about them.

    Signifacant issues of ownership and leadership preveent people taking responsibility, initiative and degress of risk associated with innovative approaches across a range of public sectors (often such approaches are of necessity in voluntray adn community or private sector ofr survival i.e the service demension has significantly dimished in public service and the ethos of serivce is dis;located from that of being a good and responsive citizen, especially when you are paid to be one!

    Better support and recongnition and flexibility to a allow volunteering as a  route to the market place/employment.

     Trust, empower and support the voluntary sector in more consistent ways to delivery by enabling/ invoking Compacts rahter than talk about them or framing them to hang them on  walls.

    How can government at all levels work together to tackle worklessness and promote enterprise in the most deprived areas?

    Reward partnership working across public, private and voluntary sectors. Reward businesses/ industries who train develop and undertake proper apprenticeships and penalise those that don't and apprecaite the difficulties of  micros/SMEs to undertake big Government schemes  which are easier for Blue Chips to enact than local micro and small businesses.

    Mainstream participatory budegting, self-build housing and local food production for most deprived areas as routes to productive work and skill developmnet  Move away from big funding schemes that trickle down, short live endlessly changing initiatives and endless pilots that are never mainstream and rolled out especailly where they work.

  • 349 in reply to 325
    02/04/2008, 4:04 PM :: Posted by John Radford (Posts 4)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    I think this is the most important issue raised in this consultation and yet the most difficult one to deliver on.  By tackling this, in areas such as the London Thames Gateway, Government (local and national) will help to solve many issues ranging from climate change (local people working locally will consume less CO2), social unrest, general area deprivation.  Successive Governments have taken various actions for different reasons.  Tories tried bashing the unemployed a la Tebbitt and Labour has sought to resolve the benefits/tax conundrum.  I've never worked closely in this area but it seems as a relatively well informed outsider that the problems are around incentives and education.  The incentive issue is tricky.  If you make it worthwhile it opens up opportunities for fraud and abuse, but if you don't offer enough you make life on benefits easier.  And the whole process appears to be so complex.  Why can't a simple regime be designed that incentivises people into skill development and/or work?

    It seems to me that the issue is potentially labour intensive. Maybe we simply don't invest in enough "mentors" to work with people who need to be encouraged/educated out of the various poverty traps that our system currently creates.  Short weekly/monthly/whatever trips to the job centre are never likely to be enough to make a difference.  Having someone who devotes several hours a week for several weeks will help to develop and encourage people and at the same time identify the liberty takers.  It will presumably also directly create a few thousand jobs!

    I don't pretend to know whether that is practical, affordable or feasible, but we do need to resolve this otherwise places like the London Thames Gateway will be in the invidious position of creating housing and jobs but at the same time there will be tens of thousands of people out of work whilst the jobs created are filled by people who help devastate the environment by driving miles to work!

  • 354 in reply to 325
    04/04/2008, 9:17 PM :: Posted by SaveTheWorld (Posts 13)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    How can government at all levels work together to tackle worklessness and promote enterprise in the most deprived areas?

    I was lucky enough to travel around the world, visiting Asia, New Zealand, Australia, Poland and many european coutries west of that poverty clad country – of yes, and the good old U.S.of.A.  What would our grandparents, that had to save a few coppers in a jar each week towards the family summer trip, this of our world today.  Mobile phones, shopping malls, pizzas on request, plasma screen TVs, computers and cheap supermarkets. 

    It is no wonder overseas students want come to Britain to learn and take in experiences of living in our country – and then they return home telling their families how we perform. This begins to paint the picture that there are so many examples of how enterprise has lifted us, and of course we begin to take them for granted.  We live in a Britain of plenty and yet we still have not learnt to invest the correct balance of GDP into our deprived areas.

    Countries abroad know the best inventions came out of Britain, yet we still let children live in poverty, cannot stamp our people trafficking or the drugs problem, and we have got distracted by the global credit gloom. 

    Adding all these factors together what is missing is to rejoice in what we have, be more thankfull that we were not born in some lonely village in Africa, treasure our right to a free vote of choice as we watch confict zone citizens massacered by dictators or be thankfull that we do not feel mass hatred between faiths and cultures.

    What we need to do is focus on the positive news our country has, giving the rich people across the world every reason to invest in our country.  We need to direct that investment into our deprived areas to create jobs.

    I only have praise for the many migrants wanting to come to Britain and when we realise the awful lives some have left behind in their damage ridden country we should extend out arm and protect them.  The refugees I know are wonderful people, they work hard and love their new home, let us not be afraid of helping others.

    I want to see our Prime Minister, who was the best Chancellor ever known, become the President of Europe, because if you ask people in communities about unlocking talent they will agree he has the ability to solve the global economy.  Let us be thankfull he and his government have fiscal experiences taking us through the sea of monetary storm.  We are strong, compared with other countries,  because our government is determination to build a highly skilled and creative workforce, absolutely as sound as a pound.  But it will take more courage . 

    Your question needs to be answered by projecting a future vision of golbal opportunities, as we seek to attract others to invest in our communities, making us more competitive in the world.  It takes time to learn new skills and this is where govermnment needs to promote and encourage citizens to become active and to grow more confident and to take more control of their health and wellbeing.  We also need more social enterprises to be able to get involved in delivering public services.

    My top hot tip to help solve this problem of worklessness if for Government to lead by example.  I would like each MP to use 10% of their constituency office budget to set up new learning and skills projects for in their community,  Year on Year these taking part projects in their own constituencies – with the Chancellor allowing pound for pound match funding to double up on new opportunities to empower local people.  This way would enable the MPs to be part of leadership training and would encourage more people to think about taking up a Governance responsibility - while learning about their neighbours and about the diversity in the community.

    I would like to see central Governement at all levels, beginning with Cabinet Ministers, to be given the task of coming up with one new inventive idea each on how they will tackle worklessness. I expect each has one pet idea and now is the time to try their innovative projects – I challenge those at the top, who must each have lots of good connections, to come us with their list of actions to inspire us and give us the renewed confidence that our economy will be able to be stimulated by and which can build a strong culture for new enterprises.

    Next let us see each onstituency run  news stories on how they are getting on.  A bit like Challenge Anika, with do-good news as the Community Leaders get involved to call on favours from businesses to see new results. 

    AND:-

    There must be a knees up, community celebration, that tells the world how much Britain knows what is good for us all.  It would be great if the art galleries, museums and cinemas can be themed during a Britishness Week to put on Proud of our Community events, working with government, businesses, communities, health and public services and for the deprived areas to have exchange visits with the more afluent.  During these celebrations the government should hand out community and voluntary group bursaries based on a challenge ideas contest, to be used in building a community spirited legacy - year on year inspiring more people to come up with new ideas. 

    Invest in people and the jobs come to life, by citizens wanting more services, happy days and new wealth.

    Go for it - Goverment is the reflection of public opinion and what I hear in my town is we want opportunities.

  • 358 in reply to 325
    08/04/2008, 3:40 PM :: Posted by ruth41 (Posts 1)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    The most obvious thing is make it much easier for people to do short term temporary work. As an employer I have times when I need extra temporary workers say for a month. But no-one who is on job seekers will come off benefits for a month as it is so difficult and takes so long for them to get benefits again after a month. As an employer I am also much happier to take a risk employing someone for a month who may not have much experience or worked for a long time, than take a risk in employing someone for a permanent month. Short term temporary work also give people a chance to demonstrate they can do the job and this would help them get a more permanent job.

    The other obvious thing is to provide support to people with mental health problems to stay in employment. A close relative has bipolar. She works full time, but when she first became ill she was off sick for a long time. There was nobody to provide support in getting her back to work or to liaise with her employer. All the projects/staff only provided help to people who had were unemployed. I provided lots of this help, and because of my discussions with the employer they agreed to keep her post open to her for 3 more months and then do a phased return. But it is so much easier to help people keep their job than try to get them a job after they have been unemployed due to mental health problems.

  • 363 in reply to 358
    09/04/2008, 5:42 PM :: Posted by Anne Wilkins (Posts 23)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    Thank you for your comments. It has been interesting to read your views on tackling worklessness and promoting enterprise. Many of the comments have been positive about a co-ordinated response to social and economical regeneration issues but you are also keen that the area of worklessness should not be seen in isolation and should be considered in the context of housing, cohesion, anti-social behaviour and drugs. The points you have raised have been fed back to the policy teams.

    We have not received responses to all the questions posed on the forum so please keep sharing your views with us. We will keep all those who have responded up to date with the progress of The White Paper.

    During the run up to the local elections (10 April 2008 - 1 May 2008) we are not able to respond to your questions or comments but please keep them coming in and you will hear from us in early May.

    In particular we are interested in your examples of how the actions of community groups have been maximised to involve more people in local issues, especially with under-represented groups as this is something we are focussing on in the EWP.

    Please post your comments here or email us at unlockingtalent@communities.gsi.gov.uk

    The first edition of our stakeholder newsletter Unlocking Talent is now available. To view the newsletter register at http://haveyoursay.communities.gov.uk/user/CreateUser.aspx?ReturnUrl=/content/HaveYourSay.aspx. Once registered please select newsletters and subscribe to future editions.

    You can also use this link www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/powerpack to find out more about our Community Power Packs. These packs have been designed to help local groups to contribute to the empowerment debate by running a discussion group.

    Anne (Moderator)

  • 368 in reply to 325
    10/04/2008, 4:09 PM :: Posted by SaveTheWorld (Posts 13)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    What are the best means of coordinating social, economic and physical regeneration?
     
    Much good work is being done in communities -  but we have probably more barriers that any generation in dealing with what are big issues as local citizens. It is required for people to be able to get help, support, encouragement and a shoulder to guide them. I praise one of the best actions taken to help citizens to become active – where their mental and physical wellbeing become improved at the same time as their spiritual wellbeing.   It is called Health Trainers.
     
    The only problem is the speed this has taken to begin to be implemented and here I would liken anything that is proposed in the Communities Empowerment White Paper needs to address the question of how long implementation takes – the slower that happens obviously the slower people living in communities feel improvements. Be bold and make things happen fast and fruitfully.
     
    Please let me explain why a link between improving wellbeing or mental health and supporting citizens to become active is necessary. The answer is most clearly embedded into the Department of Health statement on 20th July 2005 – and it is clearly the legally responsible bodies need to protect themselves by ensuring all those giving out advice have the necessary accreditation, otherwise in our current blame culture there could be sad consequences for government. The answer is to work with the accreditation bodies and trainer professionals to get a wide selection of accreditation routes open to meet all the individual learning needs. 
     
    It is surely as important to take the developing Health Trainers and respect their growing skills, These can become a central feature in communities of coordinating social, economic and physical regeneration – where we put the person first and no longer just look at the bricks and mortar solutions. Government has come up with a great solution by going forward with the Health Trainer programme, it needs to be accredited in every community to ensure people get the best and fastest access to improved mental health and wellbeing while at the same time realising that they can take part in the decisions that affect their lives. 
     
    Putting good connecting and guidance ideas into communities – ones we can respect, are robust and well thought out enable the best kind of co-ordination but it has to be based on encouraging as many citizens as possible to understand why and how we can be more and better participative to help deprived areas and those in need.     
     
    The following was the Ministerial Statement that has inspired my confidence that more can be done:-
     
    “WRITTEN MINISTERIAL STATEMENT - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
     

    Wednesday 20 July 2005 - The Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health: Written Ministerial Statement on Health Trainers

     

    In the White Paper “Choosing Health” we announced the introduction of health trainers, a new type of personal health support in the public health workforce. From 2006 NHS accredited health trainers will be giving support to people who want it in areas of highest need. Many people have difficulty in changing to a healthier way of life. There is a great deal of advice and information available and exhortations to change often from distant national bodies and others, but equally often with little recognition of the realities of everyday life. There is support but it is patchy, fragmented and does not fit with their lives. It may be available at the wrong time of day or only accessible to people who speak and read English well, and access is unequal and erratic. Health trainers are designed to address these problems. Heath trainers will be visible and accessible to local people through living and working in the communities they serve providing “support from next door”. They will engage local people where they are to be found, for example, mothers at the children’s centre, customers at the local pharmacy, members of the tenants’ association. Their task is to motivate individuals to set personal goals for improving their health, by developing personal health plans using a core set of skills based on health psychology and a good understanding of what works. They will support people to carry out their plans, eg, accompanying a woman to a screening appointment; encouraging a teenage mother to go to the children’s centre by arranging to meet her; planning a walking route with a fifty year old man. They will identify barriers with individuals to healthier choices and help find individual solutions by listening, empathising and sharing experiences. They will be able to ‘signpost’ people to local services that can support their healthier choices, through their detailed knowledge of the local area. Health trainers may refer individuals on, but will also encourage, motivate and support them to use what is available, eg information about the local smoking cessation service, and then go with them to the first session”.

    This is a good start – worth all communities knowing about to help keep moving forward.

  • 371 in reply to 325
    11/04/2008, 4:07 PM :: Posted by ianj (Posts 6)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    One has to recognise that people have to take ownership of their community and recognise the relationship between enterprise as a wealth generator and also as a social function.  Work is so much more than a tool to grow GDP. We have separated the two particularly with the development of large corporate businesses.  The Government is fully aware of the potential of social enterprise which links the economic and the social and which is also underpinned by the recognition that enterprise can only function successfully if resources are used wisely, particularly as they are finite. Small businesses within and around our neighbourhoods and villages have a crucial role to play as they have a huge stake in the future of their communities. 

    Too often Adam Smith’s work is used to continue the separation of the social and economic but he would have been astounded at what the neo-conservative free market corporate world say in his name.  Smith did not believe that a totally free market turns greed into socially optimal outcomes.  Smith’s free market was based on local small businesses and crafts people working to obtain a fair living for their families not monolithical global businesses.  The development of a person’s wellbeing that gives them meaning though their work and their social self interest is not the same as current regime of corporate power and greed.

    Smith’s concept of the ‘invisible hand’ of the market is consistently overstated by liberal free marketers as the mantra for non intervention in their global dominance of the social infrastructure and their lack of environmental responsibility.  In fact smith mentions it once in his book ‘The Wealth of Nations’ (1776) which runs to over 1,000 pages.

    ‘By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was not part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.’ Smith (1776).

    He mentions it in the context of the entrepreneur investing locally in ventures he himself controls in a social and environmental system in which he is also personally embedded, where people usually produce goods which are desired by their immediate neighbours.  Smith was deeply aware of the responsibility of power and governance in an economic system but both the corporate neo-conservatives and neo-Marxists have lost this holistic perspective. 

    This social and economic linkage has on many occasions been subsequently acknowledged by numerous economists that unbridled self-interest can bring unwanted consequences, (a phrase ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ used by Lloyd, 1883, and ‘Affluent Society’, Galbraith, 1958). We have to once more support the small businesses and social enterprises to work with their community and not the large corporate models with their ‘out of town’ version of service delivery. Here local partnerships are crucial and the regional approach just does not work. Hopefully the BERRs work on Prosperous Places: Taking forward the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration will assist in this process. With Climate Change and Peak Oil and the depletion of other resources we need to re-localise our communities.

    Most people in ‘deprived’ communities just get on with their lives the best way they can and on many occasions feel abandoned by mainstream public life.  This sense of neglect can unconsciously grow through generations and, as we know, can cause huge social problems. Most initiatives to deal with these problems are based around short term projects and programmes much like using band aids to hide the damage than by getting rid of the underlying causes.  Of course announcing such schemes appears politically to be positive but those on the receiving end will just shrug and say ‘here we go again’.

    Enterprise comes about from ideas, inquiring minds and passion to improve things and make a difference, to face a challenge and be a success.  It does not come about from a business plan or how to manage a cash flow. These aspects are easily taught once the person is driving forward their ideas.  On many occasions an individual’s enthusiasm can lead to a drive to escape and therefore the benefit to their community is lost. As mentioned earlier this passion and innovation has to first be linked to a concern about the environment in which a person lives, a concern for their neighbours and for the wellbeing of others.  We need to embed this enterprise within the communities of place and support the communities of interest to release it.

    And as James Paton said above Volunteering can be a great stepping stone that supports a myriad of needs and interests, it develops community bonds, it assists in developing services and community cohesion it can also enable people to take on more responsibility, grow their confidence and self-esteem and enable people to work together on a common causes. This joint endeavour can support people into work and also assist in establishing local solutions (social enterprises) to deal with problems or address opportunities.  This also links into John Radford’s comments regarding mentoring, enabling and supporting people to contribute to their community at their own pace can lead onto training opportunities and long term employment.  The focus has to be on the individual and the community and not the benefit of a government department.

  • 376 in reply to 325
    17/04/2008, 3:23 PM :: Posted by SaveTheWorld (Posts 13)

    Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    Co-ordinating social, economic and physical regeneration?

     

    Addendum ideas:-

     

    I am extremely encouraged by the quality of comments coming forward on the forum pages  This is a most wide visioning piece of work - ianj, your comments are certainly welcomed.  What an opportunity is would be for Government if somehow they could join up all the contributors who have volunteered their time in making the many positive comments and then for Government to take a bold approach in supporting us each to develop our obvious passion at putting new ideas into these periodic specialist forums.  I am seeing need for the Government Minister responsible to make contact with us all, possibly talking to the government department to which our comments relate (housing, schools, justice, etc) and develop a network that can use us all in coordinating ideas on social, economic and physical regeneration.  Why not linked into some “ graduate award programme” on community engagement with a Universities.  

     

    Getting the best coordination I think will need pulling in all ideas, good and bad, and I would also  recommend Cabinet level Ministers meets with their government civil servants and advisors who the Ministers feel are their ideas people.  Pulling together all those ideas can produce a paper that is a Top Advisory collection of ideas.  The paper should then be sent to each region for each Government Office (regions) to coordinate a meeting for the Voluntary and Community Sector organisations, youth projects and diversity voices to accept or reject the various ideas that are on the Top Advisory list.  This will help the  White Paper compilers to join the dots by sending each of the ideas lists into all the different regions.  It will be a very different way to coordinate consultation and will need to allow the regional groups to add new ideas onto the lists.  To get the best effect make the venues easily accessible and pull in ideas from those local citizens who have gone through or are going through REGENERATION.

     

    I am inspired by the real life comment from ianj above “Most people in ‘deprived’ communities just get on with their lives the best way they can and on many occasions feel abandoned by mainstream public life.” I agree and think it is time to turn this around by putting new trust into communities.  This is about building the future were all our citizens can reach their full potential. Ianj goes on to say “This sense of neglect can unconsciously grow through generations and, as we know, can cause huge social problems”. I have to say in the areas near me many people do have social problems that causes them ill health, insecurity, poverty, and I even see community anger.  We should realise that overcoming the social problems can save the NHS much money and more importantly let people have a better quality of like.  I also agree that the short term projects and programmes do not work but cause damage by not overcoming the underlying causes.  If this Communities Empowerment White Paper is to make improvements it needs to not be a cosmetic report to produce any political gain but needs to inspire we in the communties who do care about the future, those who want to make a difference and convince people “on the receiving end that will be rightly suspicious and at first will just shrug and say here we go again”.  Clearly the MOST important job for Government Cabinet Ministers is to get on the TV – Plaster bill boards –  Fill newspapers - Run up the eco-banners and communicate with citizens.  We need empowered communities where local people have the new skills and underpinning knowledge to best co-ordinate social, economic and physical (people) regeneration.

     

    I would like to take this space to say thank you to all the citizens who across the country do much good work in our communities.  We probably have more barriers that any generation to deal with as local citizens and without doubt people need support and help, encouragement and even need a shoulder to guide them.  I praise one of the best actions taken to help citizens to become active – where their mental and physical wellbeing becomes improved at the same time as their spiritual wellbeing.   It comes from the Department of Health and is called Health Trainers – a great vision.  I would like to see the idea of Health Trainers to be expanded to include Diversity Trainers, Equality Trainers and Cohesion Trainers – and this can be achieved by producing a progression route for all citizens who what not only to be active but what to make their community fit for purpose for the modern future.  This needs all working in harmony and the Health Service, with its reported “£billions” under-spend, should be required each year to put 25% of their under-spend into their service catchment area on helping citizens to be community active.  This will enable using local people networks that link into mental, spiritual and physical wellbeing.  New ideas on investing in people's wellbeing needs to be a priority owing to modern day stresses.      

  • Re: How can we improve deprived areas through regeneration and promoting work and enterprise?

    How refreshing to read the from the heart comments from ianj on this page.  Well done and yes, how true, many people just choose to get on with their lives.  Could that be because they see no point in trying to change things when they get hit by the brick wall of local councils, who spend hundreds of millions of pounds each, each year, being unable to "find the budget" to support small local community groups or those giving hope to diverse, social, economic and the physical excluded.

    I think if local councils had to prove they put five percent of their annual spend into helping local groups to get take chance in life it would result in people learning more skills.  The citizens would think about getting more invovled.  Well, in my home town there are a number of dedicated groups who are hitting the brick wall on funding.  It is a crime that when we are talking about how to tackle worklessness the governement and local councils do not see the advantage of pumping money into community activity groups that will inspire people who are living on the finge or are left in isolation to get on with their lives because nobody seems to care.  This means making public services involve the community groups in running services but above all else in the community diversity groups getting to be the service spenders of some of the multi-million pounds spent each year by each council.  

    Who cares wins - an old saying - but my granny would say in her days the family did the caring while the council emptied the bins.  These days people are getting too detached from society and the government needs to take a fresh approach to doing more caring.  More funds must go into people skills and be put into communities for the many who cannot read or write, cannot speak english, are victims of crime or have been abused by an education system that has not reached all the parts - resulting in distrusted citizens unable to reach their potential.

    Mental regeneration is the missing item on this website forum.  Although the developers have made billions out of putting new buildings into old communities the mental health and wellbeing of citizens has not been addressed.  If the regeneration is going to mean a grain of salt it has to be much, much more about people.  Get them to be part of what is happening in their area by investing in the diversity groups with realistic amounts per region and guess what will happen to people's confidence and motivation.  

    The NPC (New Philanthropy Capital) survey today says £40 billions a year in England is the cost of violence against women.  If instead of spending £40 billions each year on medical and legal costs the amount could be used to get more opportunities for women, and others, to get involved in their community think what might happen.  Women, and others vulunerable, would have more support, more friends, more interests to take part and ovecome the bad barriers that cause the violence.  Governement must encourage citizens to look after their health and wellbeing and to gain confidence and motivation to be voices in what their community has to offer citizens living in deprivation.   

     Keep building appartments and office blocks, more of the same, and we will see the death of communities that talk to each other.  People will become more isolated and in the long term the cost to the health service will mutliply as citizens enter into untold depths of depression.  The government must say to people - we care - and we do not give up on you - because there are still people, like those who write into this page, that give everyone new hope.

    Unlock the talent of all the people - can it be done - are they just words - or is Government ready to find new ways, engage a new breed of advisors from the grass roots and support underfunded local groups to co-ordinate social, economic, physical and mental regeneration.  I pray the answer is yes. 

View as RSS news feed in XML

To participate in this forum you must Sign in

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -